Subscribe now

Columnist and Physics

Why Isaac Newton's laws still give physicists a lot to think about

The apparent equivalence of gravitational mass to inertial mass is a remarkable and beautiful feature of the cosmos, with a deep implication, says Chanda Prescod-Weinstein

By Chanda Prescod-Weinstein

16 August 2023

Starfield - Elements of this Image Furnished by NASA ; Shutterstock ID 295846730; purchase_order: -; job: -; client: -; other: -

Aphelleon/Shutterstock

THERE are two kinds of theoretical physicists: those who use the correct equation for calculating distances in space-time, and those who don’t.

Obviously, I’m being a bit tongue in cheek here, but I’m serious when I say there is a real bifurcation. The two formulations of this equation for distance – what we call the metric – are equivalent and when used correctly will give the same answers for all calculations. But each group has reasons for believing that one is more natural than the other. Particle physicists tend to use one; relativists (people trained in general relativity) tend to use the other. I’m among the group of particle physicists who use…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox! We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers

Unlock this article

No commitment, cancel anytime*

Offer ends 15 January 2025.

*Cancel anytime within 14 days of payment to receive a refund on unserved issues.

Inclusive of applicable taxes (VAT)

or

Existing subscribers

Sign in to your account